This photo
was meant to illustrate something that upsets me a little bit (quite a bit
actually). This damaged plexiglass was not meant to appear as something actually looking quite nice (at least in my
opinion).
In November
2011 I wrote about an “apple”, to be found on Boulevard de Clichy, close to
Place de Clichy.
If you take
the time to read the post I then wrote (see here), you may understand my frustration. (Don’t
worry, I still sleep well at nights).
Here is a
copy of what I then showed to illustrate the inauguration of the “apple”, in
presence of the mayors of the 9th and 18th
arrondissements and some representatives of the City of Paris…
… and here
is what the “apple” looks like today, the pedestal being surrounded by four broken plexiglass “windows”.
My intention is not really to discuss the artistic value of this sculpture, but
rather…
Here is just
a (rather) short version of what I wrote some three or four years ago:
The “apple”
was put here to replace a statue of Charles Fourier (1772-1832) which disappeared
in 1942 during the Nazi occupation – the bronze was needed for other purposes. Charles
Fourier was some kind of predecessor to socialism, utopian socialism. He was
also the creator of the word “feminism” and defended the liberty of women.
Everybody should have the right to education….
Why the “apple”?
Actually it should refer to the “fourth apple”. Why the “the fourth apple”? Fourier
made a big case and a symbol of the fact that an apple those days cost 100
times more in Paris than where it was produced. The preceding three apples were
the one Adam gave to Eve, the “apple of discord” given to Aphrodite and
the one which dropped on Newton’s head.
Thousands
of people pass the “apple” each day and hardly anybody understands why
it’s there. I tried to tell some of the City representatives already during the
inauguration that the “apple” must be explained. I have since written three
times to the local authorities … and have never got an answer.
There is a
very small plate with a text, in French only, to possibly be seen at a little distance
from the sculpture. It reads in translation:
“The fourth
apple, homage à Charles Fourier by Franck Scurti 2010. Public command by the
City of Paris. Charles Fourier (1772-1832) is a predecessor regarding the work
organisation and the relationship between the individual and the society. His
statue, by Emile Derré, disappeared in 1942 during the Nazi occupation. Having
found a visual relationship with the bases of this notion, Franck Scurti has
created a mirror apple, symbol of universal attraction and carrier of a planisphere,
the old pedestal being covered in colours reflecting the harmony of the world
and recovering the original text of homage.”
7 comments:
Good point Peter. I saw my photos that you and I took one day several years ago and when I wanted to post on my blog, I was at a loss as to a way to explain it.
I think I gave up and deleted them although now I might have another look, post, and link to these to blog posts of yours, something I've been known to do on many occasions!
V
Cette histoire du prix d'une pomme dans un restaurant parisien me rappelle celui d'une orange dans le transsibérien.
Donc sur la panonceau ils ne parlent pas de la 4ème pomme, ce pourrait être celle qui n'existera plus lorsque les abeilles auront disparu. Ou celle qui ne poussera plus dans la Région Parisienne lorsqu'il fera trop chaud...
Pour protéger certaines statues à présent on les "clone" et garde l'original en lieu sûr ou bien pendant l'occupation on les avaient cachées. Le plexiglas au moins cela se change...
This is strange. I think that Paris is a city where history tends to be well taken care of, where people know and love the connections between the past and the present, but here it seems like the connection is broken. It's a pity!
Wow -- you make a most provocative and logical point. And it does confound me, given how Paris seems to embrace or at least acknowledge its history. It's a fascinating display/exhibit/installation -- and truly sad that the plexi has been broken and not fixed. Or any context given. I applaud your efforts to contact them, to try to have something on site. And thank you for sharing the background in both your posts.
Hola Peter:
I just finished reading your post about the apple.
I'm thinking that most of your readers, living where they do, would not ask themselves why your predicament is so.
I grew up in this third world country...living here right now.
Many times, visiting París, I told myself that a few things I saw or happened would remind me of how things work in Paraguay.
Today, while I read your post...I had the same feeling...
The attitude of the authorities responsable for such negligence is "tercer mundista" and careless.
I "adherir" myself to your feelings of indignation.
Thanks for reading this, M. Peter
Take care.
Besos:
María
Bonjour cher Peter,
Pour ma pomme ! Oui, j'aime bien savoir pourquoi, pour qui et qui à créer tel ou tel chef-d'oeuvre...
Gros bisous ♡
Post a Comment